Liberals and Dems were screaming like stuck pigs when the Supreme Court found in Citizens United that parts of the federal campaign spending act violated the First Amendment. The Supreme Court has agreed to review another campaign finance law Although this AZ law is different, it still, IMHO violates one of the basic commands of the First Amendment which is that government should stay out of the marketplace of ideas. J. Kennedy will, as usual, be the swing vote. Look for a 5-4 decision no matter who wins.
LINK
Blog Archive
Popular Posts
-
G.R. No. 195239 "x x x. Elements of Qualified Rape Duly Proved The elements of rape as provided in the Revised Penal Code (RPC) are as ...
-
The Black and Hispanic communities suffer the most from the homicide epidemic in Chicago . The nation's strictest gun laws are not work...
-
G.R. No. 178021 "x x x. While a temporary transfer or assignment of personnel is permissible even without the employee's prior cons...
-
G.R. No. 113739 In SPOUSES CLAUDIO M. ANONUEVO, and CARMELITA ANONUEVO vs. COURT OF APPEALS, HERMOGENES B. PURUGGANAN, ET. AL. and FRANCISC...
-
G.R. No. 175457 (click link) "x x x. Section 28 of the Local Government Code draws the extent of the power of local chief executives ov...
-
G.R. No. 175763 "x x x. Under Article 434 of the Civil Code, to successfully maintain an action to recover the ownership of a real prop...
-
sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2012/january2012/181962.html "x x x. The following requisites must be present for the proper invocati...
-
G.R. No. 174118 "x x x. No misrepresentation existed vitiating the seller’s consent and invalidating the contract Consent is an essenti...
-
G.R. No. 192716 "x x x. Under Section 3, [24] Rule 17 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure , as amended, the failure on the part of t...
-
G.R. No. 171750 "x x x. Three-day notice rule, not a hard and fast rule Although this issue has been obviated by our disposition of th...