The Perils of “Of Counsel” Relationships « Oregon Law Practice Management
"x x x.
The Perils of “Of Counsel” Relationships
Who is interested in forming “Of Counsel” relationships? Just about everyone, as it turns out – lawyers entering firms, lawyers leaving firms, new lawyers who are setting up a practice.
Many of us are drawn professionally to the idea of affiliating with others. Call it collegiality without the baggage of partnership.
Or is it?
Being “Of Counsel” involves more than adding some words to your letterhead. Once you form an “Of Counsel” affiliation you are a ”firm member” under the Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct (ORPC 1.0(d)). If any member of the firm has a conflict, you have a conflict and vice versa. See ORPC 1.7, 1.9 and 1.10 and OSB Formal Opinion 2005-155.
If you form an “Of Counsel” relationship, you must also be prepared for potential vicarious liability.
So who or what is “Of Counsel?”
Is an “Of Counsel” lawyer an associate?
NO
Is an “Of Counsel” lawyer a partner?
NO
If I associate someone outside the firm to work with me on a specific case, are they “Of Counsel?”
NO
If I have my own practice and provide contract lawyering services to multiple firms, am I “Of Counsel” to each of those firms?
NO
A lawyer is “Of Counsel” if he or she has a continuing professional relationship with a lawyer or law firm, other than as a partner or associate. ORPC 7.5(b). Hiring an independent contract lawyer to perform discrete tasks or associating with another lawyer on a specific case does not constitute a “continuing professional relationship.”
But that isn’t the end of it. “Of Counsel” relationships can get complex quickly. For example:
What if lawyers enter into multiple “Of Counsel” Relationships?
Or a group of lawyers sharing space use the label “Of Counsel,” but otherwise have no ongoing relationship?
And what are the malpractice coverage implications of entering into “Of Counsel” arrangements?
When it comes to analyzing ethical duties and potential liability, words and actions matter.
If you are considering entering to an “Of Counsel” relationship, please read this excellent article from Emilee Preble, PLF Staff Attorney/Excess Program Coordinator. If you have any doubts about the ethical considerations involved in these arrangements, contact the Oregon State Bar General Counsel’s office.
Copyright 2011 Beverly Michaelis
x x x."
Blog Archive
Popular Posts
-
G.R. No. 195239 "x x x. Elements of Qualified Rape Duly Proved The elements of rape as provided in the Revised Penal Code (RPC) are as ...
-
G.R. No. 178021 "x x x. While a temporary transfer or assignment of personnel is permissible even without the employee's prior cons...
-
G.R. No. 175457 (click link) "x x x. Section 28 of the Local Government Code draws the extent of the power of local chief executives ov...
-
G.R. No. 113739 In SPOUSES CLAUDIO M. ANONUEVO, and CARMELITA ANONUEVO vs. COURT OF APPEALS, HERMOGENES B. PURUGGANAN, ET. AL. and FRANCISC...
-
G.R. No. 175763 "x x x. Under Article 434 of the Civil Code, to successfully maintain an action to recover the ownership of a real prop...
-
Family wants change to custody law after child’s death | The Salt Lake Tribune "x x x. The Andersons believe the court’s disregarded th...
-
sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2012/january2012/181962.html "x x x. The following requisites must be present for the proper invocati...
-
SP103815.pdf (application/pdf Object) Republic of the Philippines Court of Appeals Manila ELEVENTH DIVISION NATASHA FASHION CLUB/SHOECAT, IN...
-
G.R. No. 174118 "x x x. No misrepresentation existed vitiating the seller’s consent and invalidating the contract Consent is an essenti...
-
G.R. No. 186132 "x x x. Our Ruling We deny the appeal, but modify the penalties imposed. The three elements of the crime of illegal rec...