At Issue: Choosing a chief justice
"x x x.
In a nutshell
Assembly Joint Resolution 49 would give state Supreme Court justices the responsibility of choosing their chief justice, replacing the current practice of the job automatically going to the most senior justice. Currently, Justice Shirley Abrahamson, who has been on the court since 1976, holds the position and has for the last 16 years.
The case for it
Supporters, who include Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, argue that the Supreme Court should be given the authority to pick its leader in a way similar to how each party in the Senate and Assembly choose their leaders.
"I think the accountability of who's running the court should fall on the justices themselves," said Rep. Tyler August, R-Walworth, the bill's main sponsor. He's joined by 17 Republican Assembly cosponsors and seven Republican Senate cosponsors.
August said that Wisconsin is one of just five states that picks its top justice solely by seniority. Twenty-two states, including bordering Illinois, Iowa and Michigan, give that authority to the justices, he said.
The case against it
Wisconsin Education Association Council, the state's largest teacher's union, has signed up in opposition to the bill, although representatives from the organization did not immediately return calls for comment this week. A spokesman for the Supreme Court said the body has not taken a position on the bill.
The Supreme Court has drawn scrutiny in the last year after flare-ups between justices became public, including a physical altercation between two judges.
August said the recent acrimony shouldn't be a reason not to change how the top justice is chosen. "We in the Legislature have been electing our own leaders since the beginning of our Constitution, and we've survived just fine," he said.
To get involved
To contact your lawmaker to oppose or support the bill, use the legislative hotline, which is staffed from 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m. weekdays; call 800-362-9472 or 608-266-9960. To send an email, visit legis.state.wi.us, select "Senate" or "Assembly" and follow the link.
Read more: http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/at-issue-choosing-a-chief-justice/article_6b3b2796-2d81-11e1-9742-0019bb2963f4.html#ixzz1hTel82u8
x x x."
Blog Archive
Popular Posts
-
G.R. No. 195239 "x x x. Elements of Qualified Rape Duly Proved The elements of rape as provided in the Revised Penal Code (RPC) are as ...
-
G.R. No. 178021 "x x x. While a temporary transfer or assignment of personnel is permissible even without the employee's prior cons...
-
G.R. No. 175457 (click link) "x x x. Section 28 of the Local Government Code draws the extent of the power of local chief executives ov...
-
G.R. No. 113739 In SPOUSES CLAUDIO M. ANONUEVO, and CARMELITA ANONUEVO vs. COURT OF APPEALS, HERMOGENES B. PURUGGANAN, ET. AL. and FRANCISC...
-
G.R. No. 175763 "x x x. Under Article 434 of the Civil Code, to successfully maintain an action to recover the ownership of a real prop...
-
Family wants change to custody law after child’s death | The Salt Lake Tribune "x x x. The Andersons believe the court’s disregarded th...
-
sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2012/january2012/181962.html "x x x. The following requisites must be present for the proper invocati...
-
SP103815.pdf (application/pdf Object) Republic of the Philippines Court of Appeals Manila ELEVENTH DIVISION NATASHA FASHION CLUB/SHOECAT, IN...
-
G.R. No. 174118 "x x x. No misrepresentation existed vitiating the seller’s consent and invalidating the contract Consent is an essenti...
-
G.R. No. 186132 "x x x. Our Ruling We deny the appeal, but modify the penalties imposed. The three elements of the crime of illegal rec...