Workplace Discrimination Includes "Retaliation" – 5 Ways to Recognize & Avoid It
"x x x.
Most business owners and HR managers already know that it’s against the law to retaliate against the squeaky wheel. That’s the easy part. The hard part is determining just who qualifies as a squeaky wheel in the first place. For your reference, here are five activities considered to be retaliation that you will want to avoid:
1. Disciplining an employee for filing a complaint:
“Several years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the anti-retaliation provisions of Title VII are not limited to actions that impact terms and conditions of employment. Rather, they prohibit any employer action that might dissuade a reasonable worker from making or supporting a claim of discrimination.” (Retaliation Claims Take Center Stage by Wooden & McLaughlin LLP)
2. Dismissing an employee for making an oral complaint about workplace conditions:
“The United States Supreme Court recently ruled that the anti retaliation provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act extends to an employee’s oral complaints… In Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the Court held that the term ‘any complaint’ includes oral and written complaints. The decision in Kasten continues a recent trend of rulings that have expanded employment-related anti-retaliation laws.” (Oral Complaints Can Provide Basis For FLSA Retaliation Claim by Nexsen Pruet, PLLC)
3. Discriminating against an employee for participating in an internal investigation:
“… the U.S. Supreme Court has expanded the definition of ‘retaliation’ under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include employees who do not complain of harassment themselves, but who participate in an internal investigation and report harassing behavior directed at themselves or others.” (U.S. Supreme Court Broadens Definition of Retaliation by Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP)
4. Penalizing an employee for supporting another employee’s complaint:
“Employers should be mindful that taking actions against an employee who has … supported the harassment claim of another employee may lead to a separate claim for retaliation, even in situations where the underlying harassment claim is not valid.” (Hostile Work Environment Refresher: What Employers Should (Still) Be Thinking About by Akerman Senterfitt)
5. Punishing an employee who is in a relationship with one who has filed a complaint:
“… the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision dramatically expanding the reach of Title VII’s anti-retaliation provision. In this decision, the court held that an employee who claimed he was terminated because his fiancé filed a discrimination claim against their common employer may pursue a retaliation claim under Title VII.” (Employment Law Alert - February 2011 by Ruskin Moscou Faltischek)
x x x."
Blog Archive
Popular Posts
-
G.R. No. 195239 "x x x. Elements of Qualified Rape Duly Proved The elements of rape as provided in the Revised Penal Code (RPC) are as ...
-
G.R. No. 178021 "x x x. While a temporary transfer or assignment of personnel is permissible even without the employee's prior cons...
-
G.R. No. 113739 In SPOUSES CLAUDIO M. ANONUEVO, and CARMELITA ANONUEVO vs. COURT OF APPEALS, HERMOGENES B. PURUGGANAN, ET. AL. and FRANCISC...
-
G.R. No. 175457 (click link) "x x x. Section 28 of the Local Government Code draws the extent of the power of local chief executives ov...
-
Family wants change to custody law after child’s death | The Salt Lake Tribune "x x x. The Andersons believe the court’s disregarded th...
-
G.R. No. 175763 "x x x. Under Article 434 of the Civil Code, to successfully maintain an action to recover the ownership of a real prop...
-
sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2012/january2012/181962.html "x x x. The following requisites must be present for the proper invocati...
-
SP103815.pdf (application/pdf Object) Republic of the Philippines Court of Appeals Manila ELEVENTH DIVISION NATASHA FASHION CLUB/SHOECAT, IN...
-
G.R. No. 186132 "x x x. Our Ruling We deny the appeal, but modify the penalties imposed. The three elements of the crime of illegal rec...
-
G.R. No. 174118 "x x x. No misrepresentation existed vitiating the seller’s consent and invalidating the contract Consent is an essenti...