The indefinite detention provision of the National Defense Authorization Act has spurred much opposition. The Plaintiff's have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene--at least temporarily. Hopefully, the U.S. Supreme Court will eventually rule on the merits of this statute. Although the statute is vague, it is potentially dangerous. Further, it could be very difficult to determine if, when and who is detained. Anyone who thought Pres. Obama would be a strong supporter of civil rights has been mistaken. Thanks to Bennett Jones for the link
UPDATE: Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg refused to block enforement of the controversal NDAA provisions. The law will remain in effect. This was a long shot and, as most expected, the government won and the plaintiffs lost.
Blog Archive
Popular Posts
-
G.R. No. 195239 "x x x. Elements of Qualified Rape Duly Proved The elements of rape as provided in the Revised Penal Code (RPC) are as ...
-
G.R. No. 178021 "x x x. While a temporary transfer or assignment of personnel is permissible even without the employee's prior cons...
-
G.R. No. 175457 (click link) "x x x. Section 28 of the Local Government Code draws the extent of the power of local chief executives ov...
-
G.R. No. 113739 In SPOUSES CLAUDIO M. ANONUEVO, and CARMELITA ANONUEVO vs. COURT OF APPEALS, HERMOGENES B. PURUGGANAN, ET. AL. and FRANCISC...
-
G.R. No. 175763 "x x x. Under Article 434 of the Civil Code, to successfully maintain an action to recover the ownership of a real prop...
-
sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2012/january2012/181962.html "x x x. The following requisites must be present for the proper invocati...
-
G.R. No. 186132 "x x x. Our Ruling We deny the appeal, but modify the penalties imposed. The three elements of the crime of illegal rec...
-
G.R. No. 174118 "x x x. No misrepresentation existed vitiating the seller’s consent and invalidating the contract Consent is an essenti...
-
G.R. No. 192716 "x x x. Under Section 3, [24] Rule 17 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure , as amended, the failure on the part of t...
-
G.R. No. 171750 "x x x. Three-day notice rule, not a hard and fast rule Although this issue has been obviated by our disposition of th...